Transformers War for Cybertron Siege Voyager Class Megatron: Relax G1 fans, there's no sign of green on this tank

It's just all over the exclusive repaint the mould got.

Baring a few rare exceptions, there are two specific characters you can confidently bank on being a part of any new line of Transformers. Optimus Prime, and Megatron, and though Prime's been trucking along (pun intended) since the beginning with major redesigns rarely happening further then being "some form of red and blue truck" (The only ones that come to mind right away being the Bat from Beast Wars, back when BW Optimus and Megatron were going to be continuations of the G1 characters), and Robots in Disguise 2001, where he was a red fire truck. Megatron on the other hand, due to a lot of people looking down on companies making toy guns look like real guns, has struggled to keep a consistent identity, with alt modes including space jets, a helicopter, a neon Batmobile that can fly, a giant hand, but a more consistent one has been some form of Tank, something that feels like it's been solidified in recent years, thanks to Combiner Wars and Titans Return, along with media like the High Moon Studios games, and the live action movies with Revenge of the Fallen. Siege looks to be continuing the trend, as Megs dons the space tank look once again. Sadly I'm still waiting for that Battlemaster, but how good of a toy is this new space tank?

Transformers Studio Series Devastator Part 1; Constructicon Scrapmetal: Clamps' future after Futurama

In the midst of the kiddified G1 Cyberverse, and the G1 nostalgia pandering Generations line, Hasbro has been putting out a third line that's equally, though debatably, nostalgia pandering, Studio Series, a line dedicated to making sure you'll never forget about the live action movies. This is a line I've been trying to find time to review for a while now as the two I do have, being Blackout and Starscream from the first movie, for whatever one can say about the designs and the inspiration, are good toys, and that's something that parts of the fandom really hate to admit. As much as I really don't like Starscream's look in the movies, I personally like to call him Doritoscream, that Starscream was the best general retail Starscream toy to launch last year. Sorry to G1 purists, that's an objective fact, especially with its main competition being the Power of the Primes Combiner torso and gimmickformers in the Cyberverse line.

Even with a line focused on bringing movieverse characters up to modern toy engineering standards, there are some that I still thought they wouldn't try to do, one of them being a version of Devastator that had individual robot modes, something they only did (to my knowledge) at Legends scale for Revenge of the Fallen. The RotF release of the Constructicons existed to either be just Devastator or just their individual modes. Maybe Combiner Wars was enough of an encouragement that they think they can pull off releasing eight toys between 2019 and 2020, split between Deluxe and Voyager class, with many of them not having individual robot modes, and some looking drastically different between modes (I'm looking at you Mixmaster and your glorified Headmaster mode). I don't know how well this thing is going to turn out, but I figured I'd see where this goes. I have no idea when this will end, all I hope is that it will end with a complete Devastator, unlike Volcanicus and Abominus.

Starting off with Vehicle mode, and with the exception of a few gaps, this is a pretty good digger mode, and the best I've personally owned... but considering as the last Transformer I owned that had a digger for an alt mode was Energon Steamhammer, who's closer to Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor, the comparison is better saved for when we get Studio Series Scavenger. I would say they can't make it worse, but I still remember what those two are supposed to look like in robot mode, and that's part of the reason why I question who thought this would be possible. Back on topic, the colour and detail remind me of the Caterpillar branded construction machines (are those a thing outside of Australia?). I know that's not saying much because the industry standard for these kinds of vehicles seems to be yellow. There isn't much paint on this guy, and while I would have liked some silver on the roof vents and the railing around the back, I don't think this guy needs a lot of paint. It's sparse but applicable. Movement isn't the best though, because while the shovel arm moves exactly the amount it needs to move (for this mode), there's no rotation for the platform for the sake of transformation. That being said, I don't see any reason why it couldn't have been in there because with the exception of the shovel arm itself, the platform isn't connected to the treads, and the platform rotation would only really affect the shoulder/ upper torso assembly. It's a shame that they didn't go the extra mile with the vehicle mode.

To the combined mode and... oh boy... As evident from my previous reviews, both here and on the main site before this one existed, traditional multi-bot combiners tend to follow a strict path of mass distribution. For five bot teams, the leader is the largest, and becomes the central torso, while the four other members become arms or legs. For the original Constructicons, two bots become legs, two bots become arms (with a parts form elbow), and the remaining two members become the chest. For movie Devastator though, it's not that simple. The rear legs (and yes I say rear legs because in the movie he walked on all fours), and torso work almost like G1 Devi, two bots become legs, two become the torso, with the only difference being that Mixmaster becomes the head and neck, something that I'm honestly surprised more combiners don't do because of how hard some leaders find hiding their second heads to be. According to this teaser image in Scrapmetal's instruction book, Devastator is going to be made up of Scrapper and parts of Scavenger (though his main focus is upper torso so I'm not surprised if he also acts as the shoulders), his left arm though is going to consist of two bots alongside Scavenger. Scrapmetal is basically the elbow and left hand of Devastator and... I can see there being some problems in the future. Based on this being the only piece of Devastator I have at the moment, and how the character moved on screen, I'm really hoping the rear legs can support a lot of weight because this is not going to support anything. I wish the digger arm could turn around for this mode so that the scoop itself could act as a third finger for the hand, instead, it just ends up looking like a giant claw arm. It's hard to bring up more about it at the moment because it's just a hand. A fat looking hand, but a hand.

Ok, so the toy's not faithful to the concept, but I like the toy's look a lot better then I do this thing.

Going to robot mode, and considering the quality of the Decepticons at the time, this is one of the most normal looking robots from the movies, and there are enough original ideas for this guy to be a good robot in his own way. Hardware isn't great, nothing but ball joints for articulation here so if you're used to Siege's quality, you're going to be disappointed. As dumb as it sounds, I actually love the hands on this guy, they're basically Clamps' hands (please tell me people still know who that is, and they've seen Futurama). In terms of design choices though, I'm not a fan of the chicken legs, I just can't get anything decent out of them in terms of movement. This is another case where I wish the digger arm could spin because it would be a cool looking scorpion tail like joint, something that I think the Combiner Wars Scavenger could do.

Lego Marvel Avengers (Endgame) 76125; Iron Man Hall of Armor: You know you're rich when this is your wardrobe

Ever since Iron Man 1, and especially Iron Man 3, there has been one set Marvel fans and MCU fans have been wanting for a very long time. The Hall of Armours, a place where Tony Stark stores all of his suits, creates new ones and deploys them as needed. It's an iconic location that people have been wanting to see in Lego form for a long time, especially thanks to all the Iron Man variants there has been over the years. Now that it's been a few weeks since the movie came out, I don't feel bad by saying that this wasn't in Endgame, however, it does fill a role that I hope Lego continue with going forward, but more on that later.

Lego Marvel Avengers (Endgame) 76124; War Machine Buster: I see that hatred against knees is still a thing.

Thanks to the combined interest in Bionicle and Exo-Force (probably the only thing I've been interested in that has a connection to Gundam), I've been interested in Lego Mechs. I enjoy seeing mocs that people create online, to seeing what Lego creates officially. The only problem is that official mechs nowadays have been struggling in the movement department. While it's understandable because these are still for kids, I get frustrated when I see mechs with unmoveable limbs, stuck in a single position for all time. It was my biggest issue with the Hulkbuster from the Infinity War line, and to spoil it quickly, it looks like War Machine got it even worse.

Lego Marvel Avengers (Endgame) 76123; Captain America Outrider Attack: Oh my god what's wrong with your face?

Yes, it's an old meme, but a fitting one.

Where would MAYvel be, without reviewing Marvel Cinematic Universe Lego sets? Or rather, where would MAYvel be without reviewing Lego Marvel sets in general, because with the exception of that Spider-Man wave which I don't plan to get even though I want those minifigs, the Lego Marvel Superheroes line is now just Marvel Cinematic Universe. Not complaining of course, especially because the large gaps including the Fantastic 4, a lot of the Mutants and any inhuman not named Mrs Marvel, are probably going to be filled in eventually due to how self-sustaining this thing has become. It'll honestly be interesting to see what happens now that Avengers Endgame has come out, to see if it is as self-sustaining now that the events that happened in it did happen. I won't be spoiling anything about Endgame here, including how accurate the sets are in the movie, all that I will say is that there are sets that never appear in the movie. Shall we begin?

Lego 8978; Skrall

LEGO Overwatch 75970; Tracer vs. Widowmaker: A better accidental scheule meet up, though could be better.

A smarter person than myself would have probably done a review of the one Captain Marvel set that came out, especially as the movie was released to tie into International Woman's Day. Blunder on my part, but not the biggest one I've made when it comes to content tied to International Woman's Day. Thankfully, I have a reasonable substitute. Tracer vs Widowmaker, two of the most recognizable Overwatch characters (in terms of one hero and one villain), so it's only fitting that Lego would put the two of them together in at least one set.

I'll say right up front though, while I enjoy the characters of Overwatch, I have not played the game. The main reason for this is the monetization practice implemented by the game, being a reasonably full price game, with Lootbox mechanics, a monetization practice that came from mobile "Free to Play" games, as a way of being able to make some money by locking rewards behind randomization systems. While I can tolerate (key word there being tolerated, because I don't support or defend it) them in Free to play games, I despise them being in games where you have to pay up front to begin playing, and with the ideal purchase of any game being potentially thousands of dollars worth of collectors editions, DLC season passes, and the Lootboxes which are almost uncapped money making, it becomes very insulting and not consumer friendly. Now while Overwatch doesn't do all of those practices, it did open the door to it. Why do I bring all this up? The reason is that I'll be using more generic names for the builds, rather than their actual names and their purpose in the game (aside from what I get off Lego.com).